Mark Millar’s assertion that a Justice League film is “an excellent way of losing $200 million” is dead-on but not for the reasons he stipulates.
The idea that the characters that comprise the membership of Justice League of America are outdated is insane. The core group of founding members of the JLA; Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman, Aquaman, Green Lantern and Martian Manhunter, are not only iconic characters, they have literally established and defined the entire superhero genre over their 75 year history.
Where the powers-that-be at DC and Warner continually fail and why a JLA film would tank is that, for some reason, these classic characters are considered by them as never good enough, never mature enough, never edgy enough. The properties are constantly the subject of reboots to make them more relevant, more gritty, more believable. In the process these characters have become unrecognizable to generations of fans that have an idealized passion for the originals.
Marketing geniuses that license the DC properties understand this passion and that is why classic images of these characters adorn every product imaginable from Converse sneakers to slip covers for car seats. You don’t see licensees rushing to conform to likenesses of these characters from DC’s New 52. Why? Because the reboots of these characters are a bastardization of the classics whose only purpose is to distance copyright and trademark enforcement from the original creators.
There is a reason that these characters have been around for as long as they have. Something about them has struck a deep cultural nerve that has allowed them to be ingrained into our society. They are beloved.
Leave them alone already!
I was watching a designer on the Rachel Ray show the other day who was expounding on the enduring virtues of classic design. Classics never go out of style. Update with accessories! This has been lost on DC.
Stan Lee has always said that a great character should be easily defined by a simple statement. The JLA lineup has that in spades to the point where just the name of each character defines most of them. These are the characters audiences want to see in a film not a convoluted mess like they saw in the film Green Lantern.
That movie should have been about a guy with a ring that gave him superpowers. Boom! Instead we had to suffer through the history of the Green Lantern Corps and be introduced to more characters than we were ready to digest. Seriously. I just wanted to see Green Lantern fight some bad guys and save the day with his bad-ass ring!
Marvel Entertainment gets this. They do a great job of embracing the original source material and simply defining their characters. Look at The Avengers. Iron Man – guy in a metal suit. Thor – god of thunder. Captain America – super soldier. Hulk…now there’s a study.
The Hulk was in two films that audiences could not embrace. Those films were too much about what made Bruce Banner tick. Inner conflicts. Fancy cinematography. CGI. They strayed away from what was simple yet great about the character: Make Hulk mad and Hulk will smash. Oh, and he’s green.
Director Josh Whedon understood this and gave us the Hulk that we saw in The Avengers. Suddenly the Hulk was a breakout character again. Hulk was there. Hulk got pissed. Hulk smashed. Ta-da! The audience ate it up.
The Avengers was brilliant in its simplicity regarding character development. Every character was easily defined, relying heavily on what people knew and expected from them, not from their previous individual movies as much as what we knew about them from their decades of existence in popular culture.
With The Avengers film, Marvel Entertainment had a plan to market each character through their own feature film then combine them as a super group in The Avengers capitalizing on the exact marketing strategy that Stan Lee exploited with the comic books featuring the same characters. Stan, ironically, borrowed this strategy from DC who’s success combining their own banner characters to form the JLA, in part, instigated the creation of The Fantastic Four, miraculously giving Marvel a new life.
DC would do well to reverse engineer this marketing plan by giving us a Justice League film that gives us highlights of the classic characters as we know and love them in a dynamite team adventure then spinning each character off into their own film after audiences have re-embraced the characters. This would work best if they were sure not to convolute the characters and dramatically depart from the institutions that they already are.
Good luck with that.
Maybe DC would be less likely to over think their characters if the film was titled Super Friends.
It may be that the only producers capable of making a profitable Justice League film are those in the porn industry. Those superheroes are always recognizable, even with their clothes off.
More on this rant next week.
Gerry Giovinco
Tags: Aquaman, Batman, Captain America, Converse, DC, DC Comics, DC New 52, FANTASTIC FOUR, Green Lantern, Hulk, Iron Man, JLA, Josh Whedon, JUSTICE LEAGUE, Justice League of America, Mark Millar, Martian Manhunter, Marvel Entertainment, Rachel Ray, Stan Lee, Super Friends, super hero, superhero, Superman, The Avengers, Thor, Warner, Warner Bros, Wonder Woman



Do we need a live action JLA movie? Live action movies are always assumed to be the natural apotheosis of comic books as if the comic medium won’t be taken seriously until some thespian is encased in rubber and leather and running around onscreen. Is it as good as the comic? Generally not. Will it get people to read comics? Probably not. All movie adaptations seem to do is, if they are successful, blow the dust off of a number of decades old properties that can make money for the big company that holds the deed.
The only medium where I have thoroughly enjoyed comic adaptations is in animated series. DC has always been well ahead of Marvel in this realm until recently. When Marvel was fumbling with stylistically awful and very clunky versions of Spider-Man, Iron Man, Hulk and the X-Men, Warners did the brilliant move of handing Batman over to Bruce Timm to tailor decades of tedious continuity and make the definitive version of the character. It’s only been recently that Marvel has come close with their Avengers cartoon.
For me the cartoons are fine. Maybe that’s all they need to be rather than the bloated spectacles that knock everybody over the head with their over-hyped arrivals and then slink off to the $5 DVD bin at Walmart less than a year following their opening.
[...] week, in my blog post Mark Millar is Right!, I took a sarcastic tone while agreeing with Millar that a Justice League film would fail. I [...]